We all forget how hard interviews can be. Applicants walk into a strange room and face what can be a long line of unknown people who fire a lot of tricky questions at them. It's not surprising that their minds go a complete blank. If you're the interviewer and you make an effort to put the interviewees at their ease, then they're more likely to express their opinions coherently and give you a chance to assess them properly. Interviews are often too theoretical. You get the applicant's views on, for example, the principles of marketing and then throw in some tough questions to see if they're up to speed on the latest developments. But introducing a hands-on activity can be more telling, because then you can assess how they approach everyday activities. I know some people argue that at senior level it's a waste of time and you should be checking how they deal with clients and colleagues, but I'm not convinced. You have perhaps 30 minutes to assess an applicant. I think considerable work needs to be done beforehand with the CVs - checking if they have appropriate qualifications and so on. What you can't get from the application, though – except from references, and I don't find those very reliable - is an idea of how people act in the workplace. I focus on that, by asking questions which should reveal how they'd react in different circumstances and with a variety of colleagues. Interviewing isn't something I'm good at, I'm afraid. I don't trust my own judgement for such important decisions. That's why I usually have about five other people with me, not necessarily from the particular department, though. I realise this prevents me from making the interview seem like an informal chat, but I'm not sure of the overall benefit of that - perhaps it provides an insight into how the applicant thinks and behaves outside work, but that's not crucial. One's trying to assess so many different aspects of potential employees. Time's limited, and you can get bogged down in asking challenging questions relevant to particular duties in the job description. It's easy to forget to allow time for applicants to find out things that are relevant to them. It's sometimes seen just as a courtesy or a way of making them feel comfortable, but it can give you real insight into how they think and react to the post.

我们都忘记了面试有多艰难。面试者走进一个陌生的房间面对一大排不认识的人问你一大堆棘手的问题。不要对他们大脑空白感到吃惊。如果你是面试官你要努力让面试者感到放松，这样他们才能有条不紊地表达表达自己的观点，与此同时，你也能有机会对他们做出正确的评估。面试通常都太理论化了。比如，你获悉面试者关于市场营销学的看法后就抛出一些刁钻的问题来了解他们是否跟上最新的发展。但这远不如让他们讲一个他们的亲身经历，因为通过了解他们如何处理日常事务来判断才能说明问题。我知道有些人认为这对于高层来说就是浪费时间，他们觉得你应该测试他们如何处理与客户以及同事的关系，对此，我并不赞同。——by 石豆豆 from 大家网

这篇材料你能听出多少？点击这里做听写，提高外语水平>>